Re: David Rohl - Part II

From: Michael Hughbank
Date: 02 Sep 1998
Time: 21:37:12
Remote Name:


I find all of the comments regarding Rohl's work missing one MAJOR point that I think must be taken into consideration. that is the fact that his chronology is based on the assumption that we live in a static universe. Retrocalculation of the motions of any planetary body, in my opinion, cannot be used prior to the 7th century BCE in the light of Immanuel Velikovsky's research.